Court Closes Curtain on Kansas
Center for Reproductive Rights Statement on Senate's Vote to Repeal the Global Gag Rule
Women Suffer Decades of Abuse in Kenya’s Health Facilities
Rights Groups Hail Decision Striking Down Michigan’s 3rd Ban Attempt
The Center for Reproductive Rights Commends Mexico City for New Law Legalizing Abortion in First Trimester
Statement on Supreme Court’s Abortion Ruling by Dr. LeRoy H. Carhart
Supreme Court Rules Against Women's Health
Center for Reproductive Rights Applauds Landmark Abortion Decision by European Court of Human Rights
Center for Reproductive Rights Statement on 8th Circuit Ruling that Employers Don't Have to Cover Contraceptives in Health Plans
Nancy Northup Responds to NY Times Op-Ed
Americans Need to Know the Facts Behind Reversing Roe v. Wade
Center Applauds Congressional Leadership for Prevention First Act
print this page | email this page | join mailing list
Center for Reproductive Rights Statement on Senate’s Vote to Repeal the Global Gag Rule

The Center for Reproductive Rights calls on President Bush to sign the bill repealing the Global Gag Rule. The President has repeatedly stated his commitment to cultivating democracy abroad and should therefore, take this opportunity to take action that reflects that promise, and repeal the policy.

The Global Gag Rule, also known as the Mexico City Policy, prohibits any non-governmental organization (NGO) overseas that receives U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) family planning funds from using their own money to provide abortion services; to advocate for changes in abortion laws; or even to provide full and accurate medical information about legal abortion services to their patients.

Not only has the policy had harmful and widespread effects on women throughout the world by shutting down health facilities and limiting the full range of reproductive health services, it has stifled debate and the ability of foreign NGOs to lobby their governments—in effect, undermining their right to exercise freedom of speech.

The gag rule would be unconstitutional if it were applied to NGOs here in the U.S. and therefore, creates a double standard. As then-appellate court judge Ruth Bader Ginsburg articulated in a 1989 case challenging the gag rule:

If our land is one "of freedom, of equal opportunity, of religious tolerance, and of good will for other peoples who share our aspirations," it is in no small measure because our Constitution restrains all officialdom from infringing on fundamental human rights; just as our flag "carries its message ... both at home and abroad," so does our Constitution and the values it expresses.