12/18/03 - Center Praises FDA Panels’ Recommendations to Make Emergency Contraception Over-The-Counter
12/3/03 - Ninth Circuit to Hear Oral Argument Against Arizona's Regulation of Abortion Clinics
11/24/03 - Hearing Set in Legal Challenge to Kansas Law that Violates Teens’ Rights to Confidential Health Care
11/21/03-Hearing Set in Court Challenge to Virginia’s Abortion Ban
11/14/03 - Tenth Circuit Asked to Uphold Decision Striking Down Oklahoma Parental Consent for Abortion Law
11/7/03 - Federal Abortion Ban Blocked by Judges in Nebraska, New York and California
11/5/03 - Federal Abortion Ban Blocked by Nebraska Judge Minutes After President Bush Signs it into Law
11/4/03 - Nebraska Doctor Takes Federal Abortion Ban to Court
11/4/03 - President Bush Scheduled to Sign Abortion Ban into Law
11/3/03 - Hearing Set in Legal Challenge to First-Ever Federal Abortion Ban
10/31/03 - Nebraska Doctor Challenges Federal Abortion Ban in Court Today
10/31/03 - FIRST-EVER FEDERAL ABORTION BAN CHALLENGED
10/30/03 - Council of Europe Finds Evidence of Forced Sterilization of Romani Women in Slovakia
10/28/03 - Slovak Investigation Covers Up Human Rights Abuses
10/22/03 - Center Vows to Challenge Unconstitutional Abortion Ban Inching Toward President's Desk
10/20/03 - Women’s Health Experts from Kenya and Peru Speak Out on the Impact of the Global Gag Rule
10/15/03 - Alaska Court Protects Young Women's Right to Abortion
10/6/03 - Doctors and Counselors Fight Kansas Law that Violates Teens' Rights to Confidential Health Care
10/3/03 - Center Vows to Challenge Unconstitutional Abortion Ban Inching Toward President's Desk
10/1/03 - Unconstitutional Ban on Safe Abortion Procedures Heads Towards President's Desk
9/24/03 Indiana Supreme Court Expands Medicaid Funding for Abortion
9/23/03 - North Dakota Supreme Court Throws out Abortion-Breast Cancer Lawsuit Against Clinic
9/18/03 - As Congress Moves to Pass Dangerous Abortion Ban, Center Prepares Court Challenge to Protect Women's Health
9/16/03 - Alabama Taxpayers Forced to Pay for State-Mandated, Ideological Materials on Abortion
9/16/03 - Abortion Providers Ask Appeals Court to Affirm Ruling Striking Down Florida’s Biased Counseling Law
9/04/03 - Young Mexican Rape Victim Speaks Out on Her 18th Birthday, Urging the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights to Formally Admit Her Case
9/3/03 - Sex Discrimination Continues in Florida After Court Refuses to Overturn Ban on Medicaid Funded Abortions
9/2/03 - Fifth Circuit Set to Hear Case Involving Prison Inmate Forced to Carry Pregnancy to Term
8/27/03 - International Human Rights Settlement Expected to Improve Women’s Access to Reproductive Health Care in Peru
8/21/03 - ACLU, Center for Reproductive Rights, and Florida NOW Say Appointing a Guardian for a Fetus Threatens the Health and Rights of Pregnant Women in Florida
7/28/03 - Judge Orders Alabama to Absorb Costs of State-Mandated, Ideological Materials on Abortion and Pregnancy
7/22/03 - Human Rights Groups Call on Slovakia to Address Illegal Sterilization of Romani Women
7/15/03 - U.S. House Compromises Women's Lives by Refusing to Reinstate Funding for UNFPA
7/10/03 - Four Women Imprisoned for Abortion Granted Amnesty by Nepal's King
7/10/03 - Florida Supreme Court Upholds Young Women's Constitutional Right to Abortion
7/10/03 - Senate Votes to Overturn the Global Gag Rule
7/9/03 - "Choose-Life" License Plate Scheme Halted in Louisiana
7/1/03 - Judge Enjoins Virginia’s Abortion Ban
7/1/03 - Nepal's King Urged to Continue Commitment to Human Rights by Releasing Women Imprisoned for Abortion
6/27/03 - Center Applauds Supreme Court Decision to Let Judgement Stand in Nuremberg Case
6/26/03 - U.S. Supreme Court Reaffirms American's Right to Privacy in Landmark Case
6/24/03 - Argument Set for Court Challenge to Louisiana's Speciality License Plates
6/18/03 - Virginia's Abortion Ban Challenged in Federal Court
6/17/03 - Abortion Clinic Asks Court to Affirm Ruling Rejecting Abortion-Breast Cancer Scare Tactic
6/17/03 - Groups Fight Efforts to Interfere With Care of Severely Disabled Rape Victim
6/16/03 - Court Challeng to Florida's Ban on Medicaid Funded Abortions
6/5/03 - House Passes Dangerous, Unconstitutional Abortion Ban
5/16/03 - ACLU and Center Admonish Florida for Failing to Protect Health and Rights of a Rape Victim
5/14/03 - Congress Urged to Lift Ban on Abortions at Military Facilities Abroad
5/14/03 - ACLU and Center Ask Court to Protect the Health and Rights of a Florida Rape Victim
5/6/03 - Women’s Access to Reproductive Health Care in MI no Longer at Risk After Law Suit Settled
5/2/03 - Bush Admin Urged to Implement HIV/AIDS Initiative Without Strings Attached
4/30/03 - Women in Indiana Forced to Make Two Trips to a Clinic in Order to Obtain an Abortion
4/28/03 - Supreme Court Upholds Threat to Abortion Patients’ Confidentiality
4/11/03 - Statement from Nancy Northup: Congress Threatens Young Women's Right to Choose Abortion
3/24/03 - Center's Expert Simon Heller to Testify Before Congress Against Abortion Ban
3/14/03 - Providers Challenge Michigan Law that Impairs Access to Reproductive Health Care
3/13/03 - Senate Passes Unconstitutional Abortion Ban
3/10/03 - Latin American Courts Violate Reproductive Rights
3/7/03 - Challenge to "Choose Life" License Plates Continues in Louisiana
3/7/03 - International Women’s Day Marred by Attacks on Women’s Reproductive Rights
3/3/03 - Indiana’s "Two-Trip" Requirement Temporarily Blocked after Clinics Challenge Law
2/26/03 - Center for Reproductive Rights Statement on U.S. Supreme Court Decision in Scheidler v. NOW
2/24/03 - Indiana Women Seeking Abortions to Face Burdensome "Two-Trip" Law
2/18/03 - Bush Strangles Efforts to Combat HIV/AIDS, Gender Violence and Maternal Mortality by Expanding the Global Gag Rule
2/18/03 - Prison Inmate Forced to Carry Pregnancy to Term Files an Appeal
2/13/03 - Unconstitutional Abortion Ban Introduced in US House
2/13/03-SC Doctors Ask US Supreme Court to Protect Private Medical Information
2/12/03 - Over The Counter Emergency Contraception Still Stalled Before Bush Administration FDA
2/6/03 - Slovak Government Officials Retaliate Against Romani Women and Legal Advocates for Exposing Human Rights Violations
2/4/03 - Rights Groups Target Maternal Death in Mali
1/28/03 - Romani Women Subject to Forced Sterilization in Slovakia
1/22/03 - Statement on Roe V. Wade’s 30th Anniversary
1/18/03 - War on Women's Reproductive Rights Detailed
1/15/03 - CRLP becomes the Center for Reproductive Rights
1/15/03 - Nancy Northup Begins Leadership as President of Center for Reproductive Rights
1/10/03 - Alaska’s Parental Consent Law Challenged in Superior Court
1/8/03 - 'Choose Life' License Plate Case Revived in Louisiana
1/2/03 - Texas Supreme Court Denies Funding for Medically Necessary Abortions
print this page | email this page | join mailing list
Nebraska Doctor Takes Federal Abortion Ban to Court

Statement of LeRoy Carhart, M.D.

Learn More

Three years ago, in a case in which I was the plaintiff, the U.S. Supreme Court struck down my home state of Nebraska’s law banning so-called "partial-birth abortion." That decision reaffirmed our Constitution’s protection for women’s basic right to safeguard their health and reproductive choices. It was an important victory for my patients, for every woman in the United States and for the practice of medicine in this country.

Today President Bush signed a federal law that attempts to do what Nebraska has already tried and failed to do. This statute prohibits doctors from using the safest medical procedures to terminate pregnancies starting very early in the second trimester. By signing this law, President Bush has put my patients’ health, their reproductive abilities and their very lives at risk.

I am challenging this new federal law for the same reasons I challenged the Nebraska abortion ban: it is an attack on women’s right to obtain safe abortions and it is unconstitutional.

I have just been informed that Judge Koph has issued a temporary restraining order based on a failure of the law to contain a health exception. This will prevent the Attorney General and his staff from using this act against me, my patients, all physicians that I refer to and all physicians that refer to me.

As an abortion provider, it is my duty to use the safest procedures I have available once a patient decides to terminate her pregnancy. In America, abortion is one of the safest of all surgical procedures performed by doctors. Part of the reason is that, since Roe, doctors have been able to develop new techniques – or variations of older procedures – to deal with the unique aspects of each pregnancy and each woman patient they see. I have spent over 1000 hours in post-graduate medical training in the specialty of abortion practices. I have trained with, studied with, and taught doctors throughout the United States, Europe, South America and Australia to improve abortion practice. My goal is, at all times, to use the techniques that are best suited to protecting the health of the women who seek my care. This law would, however, force me put aside that goal in order to meet the demands of politicians and federal prosecutors.

As a doctor, it is my duty to ensure that my patients receive the best medical care available to them. Doctors, not politicians, are trained to determine the best course of care for their patients. In their zeal to press forward their political agenda, however, supporters of this law have ignored the medical groups that oppose these bans, including the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. ACOG, which represents 90% of the board-certified OB-GYNs in this country, wrote a strongly supportive amicus brief in my suit against the Nebraska ban. Yet, rather than leaving medicine in the hands of doctors, politicians have again chosen to enact a broadly written law that bans far more than they will admit in public. Like the Nebraska law, this criminal ban will frighten doctors away from offering the medical services that are best for their patients.

As an American, and as one who volunteered to serve his country for over twenty years as an officer in the U.S. Air Force, I feel it is my duty to fight attempts to undermine our Constitution and the ideals we hold dear. These include the right to life, liberty and to be free from government intrusion into such intensely personal decisions as whether to have a child. And certainly from being forced to accept less safe medical options because it makes a politician feel good. The Supreme Court has ruled again and again that American women have the constitutionally protected right to choose to terminate a pregnancy, and that the government cannot impose restrictions that will endanger their health. However, supporters of this law have also chosen to ignore the Supreme Court and to again enact a law that that will harm women’s health.

I have been a doctor for thirty years. I have seen first hand the terrible human toll taken by laws that bar women from obtaining safe, legal abortions. I assure you we do not want to return to that terrible time. I cannot stand by and allow American women to die for no reason. I will therefore do everything in my power to prevent this harmful law from taking effect. That is why I am joining legal advocates, fellow providers and patients in a fight to protect women’s health, and doctors’ right to provide the best medical care available.

As a doctor, a father, a husband, and, most important, as an American who believes in a woman’s right to choose, I am challenging this dangerous, deceptive, unconstitutional law, just as I did in Stenberg v. Carhart.

To learn more, Click Here