12/16/04 - Statement by Nancy Northup, President, Center for Reproductive Rights
Center Joins Couples’ Legal Battle Against Costa Rica’s IVF Ban: Case Before Inter-American Commission Could Have Repercussions in U.S.
Center for Reproductive Rights Asks Tenth Circuit to Rehear Oklahoma Abortion Law Case
11/16/2004 - Discriminatory Oklahoma Law Put on Hold: State Agrees Not to Distribute "Choose Life" License Plate Proceeds
11/4/04 - More Harm than Good: Florida’s Constitutional Amendment
11/3/04 - Bush Administration's War on Women: Responding to the Challenge of Four More Years
10/25/04 - Fourth Circuit to Review Injunction on Virginia’s So-called "Partial Birth Infanticide" Act
10/13/04 - Florida Court Strikes Down Law Forcing Abortion Providers To Give Patients Harmful Information
10/5/04 - Abortion Rights in Trouble New Study Shows
10/1/04 - New Abortion Study Finds: If Roe were Overturned Today, Over 70 Million Women in More than Half the Country Could Lose Access to Abortion
9/23/04 - Report Exposes Failure of Law to Address Reproductive Health Problems in India
9/17/04 - For the First Time, Indiana Court of Appeals Recognizes the Rights to Abortion is Protected Under State Constitution
9/8/04 - Federal Abortion Ban Struck Down in Nebraska Case
9/2/04 - Judge in Nebraska to Rule on Final Federal Abortion Ban Trial on Wednesday, September 8
8/3/04 - Court Shuts Down Man Who Fakes Abortion Services in Louisiana
8/3/04 - Nepalese Legal Experts Seek to Remedy Reproductive Health Violations
8/2/04 - Man Who Fakes Abortion Services to Appear in Hearing Wednesday
7/26/04 - Judge Blocks Enforcement of Kansas "Kiss and Tell" Law
7/23/04 - Court Enjoins New Abortion Law, Protecting Rights of Nearly 400 Mississippi Women
7/8/04 - Court Rejects Use of European Human Rights Law to Establish Fetal Rights
7/2/04 - Center Temporarily Blocks Mississippi Abortion Law
6/18/04 - Center Wins Appeal Against Arizona Abortion Regulation and Day in Court
6/10/04 - Court Orders Preliminary Injunction Against Utah Abortion Ban
6/10/04 - In Vitro Twins Ruled as Deceased Father’s Legitimate Children
6/7/04 - Louisiana Man Sued for Faking Abortion Services
6/2/04 - Closing Arguments Presented in Nebraska Federal Abortion Ban Trial
6/2/04 - Statement of Nancy Northup, President, Center for Reproductive Rights on S. 851 "The Child Custody Protection Act"
6/1/04 - Reproductive Rights Groups Hail First Ruling to Permanently Block Federal Abortion Ban
5/27/04 - Closing Arguments Begin in Carhart v. Ashcroft Federal Abortion Ban Trial in Nebraska
5/13/04 - South Asia Report Draws Attention to Reproductive Rights Violations
5/7/04 - Statement on the FDA's Refusal to Approve Emergency Contraception
5/6/04 - State of Utah Agrees to Order Temporarily Blocking Abortion Ban
4/9/04 - Notable Quotes from Nebraska Federal Abortion Ban Trial
3/31/04 - Update: Carhart v. Ashcroft Federal Abortion Ban Trial in Nebraska
3/29/-4 - Carhart V. Ashcroft Federal Abortion Trial Begins In Nebraska
3/26/04 - Federal Abortion Trial to Begin in Nebraska
3/22/04 - Carhart v. Ashcroft Federal Abortion Ban Trial to Begin in Nebraska
2/2/04 - Virginia’s Abortion Ban Struck Down by Federal Court
1/22/04 - January 22nd Marks 31 Years of Legal Abortion in the United States
1/14/04 - Lawsuit Filed Challenging Oklahoma's "Choose Life" License Plate Legislation
1/9/04 - Florida Court Refuses to Appoint Guardian for a Fetus
print this page | email this page | join mailing list
Carhart V. Ashcroft Federal Abortion Trial Begins in Nebraska

Dr. LeRoy Carhart, victor in Supreme Court case, must litigate issue once again.

Learn More

The trial begins today in Carhart v. Ashcroft, the federal civil rights lawsuit in U.S. District Court for the District of Nebraska brought by the Center for Reproductive Rights on behalf of four doctors challenging the constitutionality of the "Partial Birth Abortion Ban Act of 2003."

The lawsuit contends that the federal ban is unconstitutional because it would ban abortions as early as 12-15 weeks in pregnancy, and would outlaw a range of safe abortions in the second trimester. The law also fails to safeguard women because it contains no exception for a woman's health.

"Four years ago, the Center for Reproductive Rights fought all the way to the Supreme Court to win a landmark ruling striking down a Nebraska abortion ban nearly identical to the federal abortion ban we challenge today. In that case, Stenberg v. Carhart, we represented LeRoy Carhart, the brave physician who is the lead plaintiff in this case.

Politicians have again come between Dr. Carhart and his patients, preventing him from giving them the best and safest medical care," stated Nancy Northup, President of the Center for Reproductive Rights, a nonprofit legal advocacy organization.

Northup, a former federal prosecutor, continued, "If this law were in effect, the considerable investigative power and prosecutorial resources of the federal criminal justice system would bear down on these doctors and invade their patients' privacy. FBI agents and U.S. Attorneys across the nation would have the full arsenal of law enforcement methods to enforce the abortion ban, including compelling testimony in the grand jury, using nationwide subpoena power to obtain medical records, and executing search warrants of doctors' offices."

The lawsuit is filed on behalf of LeRoy Carhart, M.D.,a physician licensed to practice in Nebraska, Iowa, Indiana, Kansas, Ohio, Pennsylvania, New Jersey and Wisconsin; William G. Fitzhugh, M.D., a physician licensed to practice in Virginia; William H. Knorr,M.D., a physician licensed to practice in Alabama, South Carolina, Maryland and New York; and Jill L. Vibhakar, M.D., a physician licensed to practice in Iowa. The defendant is John Ashcroft, Attorney General of the United States, The judge in the case is the Honorable Richard Kopf, appointed by former President Reagan. Lead attorney is in the lawsuit Priscilla Smith, Director of the Domestic Legal Program for the Center for Reproductive Rights, who was also on the Center's legal team in Stenberg v. Carhart.

Said Northup, "Dr. Carhart shouldn't have to be back in court, fighting the same fight all over again. Four years ago, the Supreme Court held that 'the findings and evidence support Dr. Carhart.' Nothing has changed since then, except a Congress and President bent on unraveling Roe v. Wade."