12/16/04 - Statement by Nancy Northup, President, Center for Reproductive Rights
Center Joins Couples’ Legal Battle Against Costa Rica’s IVF Ban: Case Before Inter-American Commission Could Have Repercussions in U.S.
Center for Reproductive Rights Asks Tenth Circuit to Rehear Oklahoma Abortion Law Case
11/16/2004 - Discriminatory Oklahoma Law Put on Hold: State Agrees Not to Distribute "Choose Life" License Plate Proceeds
11/4/04 - More Harm than Good: Florida’s Constitutional Amendment
11/3/04 - Bush Administration's War on Women: Responding to the Challenge of Four More Years
10/25/04 - Fourth Circuit to Review Injunction on Virginia’s So-called "Partial Birth Infanticide" Act
10/13/04 - Florida Court Strikes Down Law Forcing Abortion Providers To Give Patients Harmful Information
10/5/04 - Abortion Rights in Trouble New Study Shows
10/1/04 - New Abortion Study Finds: If Roe were Overturned Today, Over 70 Million Women in More than Half the Country Could Lose Access to Abortion
9/23/04 - Report Exposes Failure of Law to Address Reproductive Health Problems in India
9/17/04 - For the First Time, Indiana Court of Appeals Recognizes the Rights to Abortion is Protected Under State Constitution
9/8/04 - Federal Abortion Ban Struck Down in Nebraska Case
9/2/04 - Judge in Nebraska to Rule on Final Federal Abortion Ban Trial on Wednesday, September 8
8/3/04 - Court Shuts Down Man Who Fakes Abortion Services in Louisiana
8/3/04 - Nepalese Legal Experts Seek to Remedy Reproductive Health Violations
8/2/04 - Man Who Fakes Abortion Services to Appear in Hearing Wednesday
7/26/04 - Judge Blocks Enforcement of Kansas "Kiss and Tell" Law
7/23/04 - Court Enjoins New Abortion Law, Protecting Rights of Nearly 400 Mississippi Women
7/8/04 - Court Rejects Use of European Human Rights Law to Establish Fetal Rights
7/2/04 - Center Temporarily Blocks Mississippi Abortion Law
6/18/04 - Center Wins Appeal Against Arizona Abortion Regulation and Day in Court
6/10/04 - Court Orders Preliminary Injunction Against Utah Abortion Ban
6/10/04 - In Vitro Twins Ruled as Deceased Father’s Legitimate Children
6/7/04 - Louisiana Man Sued for Faking Abortion Services
6/2/04 - Closing Arguments Presented in Nebraska Federal Abortion Ban Trial
6/2/04 - Statement of Nancy Northup, President, Center for Reproductive Rights on S. 851 "The Child Custody Protection Act"
6/1/04 - Reproductive Rights Groups Hail First Ruling to Permanently Block Federal Abortion Ban
5/27/04 - Closing Arguments Begin in Carhart v. Ashcroft Federal Abortion Ban Trial in Nebraska
5/13/04 - South Asia Report Draws Attention to Reproductive Rights Violations
5/7/04 - Statement on the FDA's Refusal to Approve Emergency Contraception
5/6/04 - State of Utah Agrees to Order Temporarily Blocking Abortion Ban
4/9/04 - Notable Quotes from Nebraska Federal Abortion Ban Trial
3/31/04 - Update: Carhart v. Ashcroft Federal Abortion Ban Trial in Nebraska
3/29/-4 - Carhart V. Ashcroft Federal Abortion Trial Begins In Nebraska
3/26/04 - Federal Abortion Trial to Begin in Nebraska
3/22/04 - Carhart v. Ashcroft Federal Abortion Ban Trial to Begin in Nebraska
2/2/04 - Virginia’s Abortion Ban Struck Down by Federal Court
1/22/04 - January 22nd Marks 31 Years of Legal Abortion in the United States
1/14/04 - Lawsuit Filed Challenging Oklahoma's "Choose Life" License Plate Legislation
1/9/04 - Florida Court Refuses to Appoint Guardian for a Fetus
print this page | email this page | join mailing list
Presentations in Carhart v. Ashcroft Nebraska Federal Abortion Ban Trial End Today
April 9, 2004
Presentations by live witnesses in Carhart v. Ashcroft in U.S. District Court, Lincoln, Nebraska end today. The bench trial challenging the federal abortion ban began on March 29th with the plaintiffs represented by the Center for Reproductive Rights. The U.S. Department of Justice argued its case during this past week, April 5-9.

The final oral arguments are scheduled to occur before U.S. District Judge Richard Kopf on June 2.

NOTABLE QUOTES FROM THE NEBRASKA FEDERAL ABORTION BAN TRIAL:

1. On the opening day of the trial, U.S.DISTRICT JUDGE RICHARD KOPF noted to the lawyers: "I have to tell you, I don't see that Congress spent anywhere near the kind of effort that you folks have spent in honestly trying to give me a fair picture of the medical situation." And later, to a lawyer for the Department of Justice, "The question really is, did Congress really care about whether this was safe or unsafe."

2. Expert Witness for the plaintiffs, identified as DR. DOE, testifying on the first day of the trial in a secure, undisclosed location, was asked by plaintiffs' attorney how the Act would affect the witness's practice. "It would put a chill on the way I practice," Dr. Doe said. "I would never know if I was going to be breaching the Act using the techniques that I currently use." Then why did you agree to testify in this case? plaintiffs' attorney asked. "I thought it was the right thing to do. And that's on the basis of my past experience with seeing the results of illegal and unsafe abortion in the earlier years of my experience. So I wouldn't like to go back to those years."

3. On March 31, DR. WILLIAM FITZHUGH, asked by plaintiffs' attorney what he would do if the Act were to take effect, said: "I would probably continue until such time as I hear [about] the enforcement or somebody is making waves. . . . I would have to take my chances a little bit, I think." He was then asked, Would you risk jail time? He replied, "Probably."

4. On April 1, DR. LEROY CARHART, asked by plaintiffs' attorney what he would do if the Act were in effect, said: "I would stop doing abortions past 13 weeks and go back to where we were in 1969." Later that day, outside the courthouse, Dr. Carhart said: "This case is not about abortions in the third trimester. It affects the safest procedures I perform as early as 12 weeks of pregnancy. I won this case in the Supreme Court four years ago. I'm back in court today because the government is back in my office, coming between me and my patient and telling me that I can't put my patient's health and safety first."

THE LAWSUIT: The lawsuit is filed on behalf of LeRoy Carhart, M.D.,a physician licensed to practice in Nebraska, Iowa, Indiana, Kansas, Ohio, Pennsylvania, New Jersey and Wisconsin; William G. Fitzhugh, M.D., a physician licensed to practice in Virginia; William H. Knorr,M.D., a physician licensed to practice in Alabama, South Carolina, Maryland and New York; and Jill L. Vibhakar, M.D., a physician licensed to practice in Iowa. The defendant is John Ashcroft, Attorney General of the United States, The judge in the case is the Honorable Richard Kopf, appointed by former President Reagan. Lead attorney is in the lawsuit Priscilla Smith, Director of the Domestic Legal Program for the Center for Reproductive Rights, who was also on the Center's legal team in Stenberg v. Carhart.

BACKGROUND: Carhart v. Ashcroft is a federal civil rights lawsuit in U.S. District Court for the District of Nebraska challenging the constitutionality of the "Partial Birth Abortion Ban Act of 2003." The Center for Reproductive Rights won a 2000 Supreme Court decision in Stenberg v. Carhart, striking down a Nebraska ban on so-called "partial birth abortion," representing Dr. LeRoy Carhart, the lead plaintiff in this federal lawsuit. The current lawsuit contends that the federal ban, like the Nebraska ban, is unconstitutional because it would ban abortions as early as 12-15 weeks in pregnancy, outlaw abortions that doctors say are safe and among the best for women's health, and contains no exception for the woman's health.