12/16/04 - Statement by Nancy Northup, President, Center for Reproductive Rights
Center Joins Couples’ Legal Battle Against Costa Rica’s IVF Ban: Case Before Inter-American Commission Could Have Repercussions in U.S.
Center for Reproductive Rights Asks Tenth Circuit to Rehear Oklahoma Abortion Law Case
11/16/2004 - Discriminatory Oklahoma Law Put on Hold: State Agrees Not to Distribute "Choose Life" License Plate Proceeds
11/4/04 - More Harm than Good: Florida’s Constitutional Amendment
11/3/04 - Bush Administration's War on Women: Responding to the Challenge of Four More Years
10/25/04 - Fourth Circuit to Review Injunction on Virginia’s So-called "Partial Birth Infanticide" Act
10/13/04 - Florida Court Strikes Down Law Forcing Abortion Providers To Give Patients Harmful Information
10/5/04 - Abortion Rights in Trouble New Study Shows
10/1/04 - New Abortion Study Finds: If Roe were Overturned Today, Over 70 Million Women in More than Half the Country Could Lose Access to Abortion
9/23/04 - Report Exposes Failure of Law to Address Reproductive Health Problems in India
9/17/04 - For the First Time, Indiana Court of Appeals Recognizes the Rights to Abortion is Protected Under State Constitution
9/8/04 - Federal Abortion Ban Struck Down in Nebraska Case
9/2/04 - Judge in Nebraska to Rule on Final Federal Abortion Ban Trial on Wednesday, September 8
8/3/04 - Court Shuts Down Man Who Fakes Abortion Services in Louisiana
8/3/04 - Nepalese Legal Experts Seek to Remedy Reproductive Health Violations
8/2/04 - Man Who Fakes Abortion Services to Appear in Hearing Wednesday
7/26/04 - Judge Blocks Enforcement of Kansas "Kiss and Tell" Law
7/23/04 - Court Enjoins New Abortion Law, Protecting Rights of Nearly 400 Mississippi Women
7/8/04 - Court Rejects Use of European Human Rights Law to Establish Fetal Rights
7/2/04 - Center Temporarily Blocks Mississippi Abortion Law
6/18/04 - Center Wins Appeal Against Arizona Abortion Regulation and Day in Court
6/10/04 - Court Orders Preliminary Injunction Against Utah Abortion Ban
6/10/04 - In Vitro Twins Ruled as Deceased Father’s Legitimate Children
6/7/04 - Louisiana Man Sued for Faking Abortion Services
6/2/04 - Closing Arguments Presented in Nebraska Federal Abortion Ban Trial
6/2/04 - Statement of Nancy Northup, President, Center for Reproductive Rights on S. 851 "The Child Custody Protection Act"
6/1/04 - Reproductive Rights Groups Hail First Ruling to Permanently Block Federal Abortion Ban
5/27/04 - Closing Arguments Begin in Carhart v. Ashcroft Federal Abortion Ban Trial in Nebraska
5/13/04 - South Asia Report Draws Attention to Reproductive Rights Violations
5/7/04 - Statement on the FDA's Refusal to Approve Emergency Contraception
5/6/04 - State of Utah Agrees to Order Temporarily Blocking Abortion Ban
4/9/04 - Notable Quotes from Nebraska Federal Abortion Ban Trial
3/31/04 - Update: Carhart v. Ashcroft Federal Abortion Ban Trial in Nebraska
3/29/-4 - Carhart V. Ashcroft Federal Abortion Trial Begins In Nebraska
3/26/04 - Federal Abortion Trial to Begin in Nebraska
3/22/04 - Carhart v. Ashcroft Federal Abortion Ban Trial to Begin in Nebraska
2/2/04 - Virginia’s Abortion Ban Struck Down by Federal Court
1/22/04 - January 22nd Marks 31 Years of Legal Abortion in the United States
1/14/04 - Lawsuit Filed Challenging Oklahoma's "Choose Life" License Plate Legislation
1/9/04 - Florida Court Refuses to Appoint Guardian for a Fetus
print this page | email this page | join mailing list
Closing Arguments Presented in Nebraska Federal Abortion Ban Trial
Learn more about the Federal Abortion Ban

Lawyers for the plaintiffs and for the U. S. Department of Justice presented final oral arguments today before U.S. District Judge Richard Kopf in Carhart v. Ashcroft, the bench trial challenging the constitutionality of the federal "Partial Birth Abortion Ban Act of 2003." Judge Kopf indicated that he would reach a decision in the case by August 31.

The Center for Reproductive Rights brought the lawsuit on behalf of Dr. LeRoy Carhart and three other doctors who say that the ban prohibits them from practicing abortion procedures that are safe and among the best for women’s health.

A similar Nebraska ban was struck down in the U.S. Supreme Court in 2000 because it banned safe abortion procedures performed as early as 12-15 weeks of pregnancy, and because it contained no exception for the woman’s health. Dr. Carhart, represented by the Center for Reproductive Rights, was also the lead plaintiff in that case, Stenberg v. Carhart.

"I’m back in court because the government is back in my office, coming between me and my patient and telling me that I can’t put my patient’s health and safety first," said Dr. Carhart. "Sitting in the courtroom, I realized that I had already heard all the arguments that were presented by the government. I’m here to say that I won’t stop my pursuit of justice until I know that I can give my patients the care that I believe is best for them."

Priscilla Smith presented the closing argument for Dr. Carhart and the other plaintiffs. Commenting on the trial, which began on March 29, Smith said: "We have established that this federal law is unconstitutional for the same reasons that the Nebraska law, which we argued and won before the Supreme Court in 2000, was unconstitutional. It bans safe abortions performed as early as 12 weeks of pregnancy, and it fails to make any exception to protect a woman’s health."

"This is a deceptive law whose true intention is to unravel Roe v. Wade," said Nancy Northup, President of the Center for Reproductive Rights. "This law would impose another devastating barrier to the delivery of reproductive health care. It would allow the federal criminal justice system to harass these doctors and invade their patients’ privacy. We will fight this law as long as necessary to keep it from going into effect."

The lawsuit is filed on behalf of: LeRoy Carhart, M.D., a physician licensed to practice in Nebraska, Iowa, Indiana, Kansas, Ohio, Pennsylvania, New Jersey and Wisconsin; William G. Fitzhugh, M.D., a physician licensed to practice in Virginia; William H. Knorr, M.D., a physician licensed to practice medicine in New York, Alabama, South Carolina and Maryland; and Jill L. Vibhakar, M.D., a physician licensed to practice in Iowa.

The defendant is John Ashcroft, Attorney General of the United States.