12/16/04 - Statement by Nancy Northup, President, Center for Reproductive Rights
Center Joins Couples’ Legal Battle Against Costa Rica’s IVF Ban: Case Before Inter-American Commission Could Have Repercussions in U.S.
Center for Reproductive Rights Asks Tenth Circuit to Rehear Oklahoma Abortion Law Case
11/16/2004 - Discriminatory Oklahoma Law Put on Hold: State Agrees Not to Distribute "Choose Life" License Plate Proceeds
11/4/04 - More Harm than Good: Florida’s Constitutional Amendment
11/3/04 - Bush Administration's War on Women: Responding to the Challenge of Four More Years
10/25/04 - Fourth Circuit to Review Injunction on Virginia’s So-called "Partial Birth Infanticide" Act
10/13/04 - Florida Court Strikes Down Law Forcing Abortion Providers To Give Patients Harmful Information
10/5/04 - Abortion Rights in Trouble New Study Shows
10/1/04 - New Abortion Study Finds: If Roe were Overturned Today, Over 70 Million Women in More than Half the Country Could Lose Access to Abortion
9/23/04 - Report Exposes Failure of Law to Address Reproductive Health Problems in India
9/17/04 - For the First Time, Indiana Court of Appeals Recognizes the Rights to Abortion is Protected Under State Constitution
9/8/04 - Federal Abortion Ban Struck Down in Nebraska Case
9/2/04 - Judge in Nebraska to Rule on Final Federal Abortion Ban Trial on Wednesday, September 8
8/3/04 - Court Shuts Down Man Who Fakes Abortion Services in Louisiana
8/3/04 - Nepalese Legal Experts Seek to Remedy Reproductive Health Violations
8/2/04 - Man Who Fakes Abortion Services to Appear in Hearing Wednesday
7/26/04 - Judge Blocks Enforcement of Kansas "Kiss and Tell" Law
7/23/04 - Court Enjoins New Abortion Law, Protecting Rights of Nearly 400 Mississippi Women
7/8/04 - Court Rejects Use of European Human Rights Law to Establish Fetal Rights
7/2/04 - Center Temporarily Blocks Mississippi Abortion Law
6/18/04 - Center Wins Appeal Against Arizona Abortion Regulation and Day in Court
6/10/04 - Court Orders Preliminary Injunction Against Utah Abortion Ban
6/10/04 - In Vitro Twins Ruled as Deceased Father’s Legitimate Children
6/7/04 - Louisiana Man Sued for Faking Abortion Services
6/2/04 - Closing Arguments Presented in Nebraska Federal Abortion Ban Trial
6/2/04 - Statement of Nancy Northup, President, Center for Reproductive Rights on S. 851 "The Child Custody Protection Act"
6/1/04 - Reproductive Rights Groups Hail First Ruling to Permanently Block Federal Abortion Ban
5/27/04 - Closing Arguments Begin in Carhart v. Ashcroft Federal Abortion Ban Trial in Nebraska
5/13/04 - South Asia Report Draws Attention to Reproductive Rights Violations
5/7/04 - Statement on the FDA's Refusal to Approve Emergency Contraception
5/6/04 - State of Utah Agrees to Order Temporarily Blocking Abortion Ban
4/9/04 - Notable Quotes from Nebraska Federal Abortion Ban Trial
3/31/04 - Update: Carhart v. Ashcroft Federal Abortion Ban Trial in Nebraska
3/29/-4 - Carhart V. Ashcroft Federal Abortion Trial Begins In Nebraska
3/26/04 - Federal Abortion Trial to Begin in Nebraska
3/22/04 - Carhart v. Ashcroft Federal Abortion Ban Trial to Begin in Nebraska
2/2/04 - Virginia’s Abortion Ban Struck Down by Federal Court
1/22/04 - January 22nd Marks 31 Years of Legal Abortion in the United States
1/14/04 - Lawsuit Filed Challenging Oklahoma's "Choose Life" License Plate Legislation
1/9/04 - Florida Court Refuses to Appoint Guardian for a Fetus
print this page | email this page | join mailing list
Louisiana Man Sued for Faking Abortion Services

Today, the Center for Reproductive Rights filed a lawsuit in the District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana against Metairie, Louisiana, resident William Graham on behalf of three women, a Metairie medical facility, one of their physicians and his patients. The lawsuit accuses Graham of intentionally interfering with women’s efforts to exercise their constitutional right to obtain an abortion through false advertising, trademark infringement, fraud, and various forms of criminal and emotional manipulation.

In a duplicitous two-pronged approach, William Graham lures his victims by co-opting the name of a well-known medical provider, the Causeway Medical Clinic, and by falsely advertising that he provides abortion referral services, thereby perpetuating that false impression. The lawsuit charges that since 1993, he has advertised or listed his operation in the phone book under headings specifically designated for organizations that provide abortion services or referrals.

Graham, however, provides neither. Instead, he strings countless women along for months, promising to connect them with doctors in private practice for a bargain price. He claims to have "set up" appointments, and then repeatedly "reschedules" them. All the while, he discusses the women’s medical conditions with them, wrongly advising them that the longer they wait to have an abortion, the less risk there will be to their health. He has every intention to prevent the women from having an abortion while the procedure is still legal.

Some of Graham’s victims testified that they were forced to carry their pregnancies to term against their wishes, jeopardizing their health, risking their education and even endangering their lives. Others were able to have abortions but had to delay the procedures, increasing the risk. In all cases, the women have suffered extreme mental anguish either by not being able to exercise their right to choose or by riding an emotional rollercoaster, not knowing when or if they’d be able to terminate their pregnancies.

One plaintiff, Priscilla Cabrera, said that she endured weeks of Graham’s deception before she had an abortion at a legitimate medical facility. "Besides being scared, I was also extremely frustrated. Mr. Graham had put me off for many weeks," Cabrera recalled. "He told me that everything was going to be fine, that we had to wait for it to be safe, that he was concerned about my health and that he was on my side."

For the last decade, the anti-choice movement has set up operations similar to Graham’s to dupe women into contacting them, only to intimidate them and prevent them from having abortions.

"It is unconscionable that this man purposely lured women into his lair under false pretenses, and then schemed to win over their confidence -- all to further his own anti-choice agenda," said Suzanne Novak, Center for Reproductive Rights attorney. "Operations like this absolutely disregard health concerns these women may have and what may be going on in their lives, both personally and financially. The bottom line is that they deny these women their basic constitutional right to decide what to do with their own bodies and, essentially, their own lives. We intend to put a stop to it."

The plaintiffs in this case are Causeway Medical Clinic; Dr. James DeGueurce and his patients; Priscilla Cabrera; and two other women. The plaintiffs are filing a class action suit on behalf of other women who have been similarly duped. The plaintiffs are represented by the Center for Reproductive Rights, Morrison & Foerster of New York, and Rittenberg and Samuel of New Orleans.

Women looking for legitimate abortion referrals should call the National Abortion Federation Hotline, (800) 772-9100. The hotline offers providers in the caller’s area; referrals to funding sources; factual information about pregnancy, abortion and state abortion restrictions; and confidential support.

For more information on clinic access and intimidation of abortion providers, see our Clinic Access and Face Laws section.