12/16/04 - Statement by Nancy Northup, President, Center for Reproductive Rights
Center Joins Couples’ Legal Battle Against Costa Rica’s IVF Ban: Case Before Inter-American Commission Could Have Repercussions in U.S.
Center for Reproductive Rights Asks Tenth Circuit to Rehear Oklahoma Abortion Law Case
11/16/2004 - Discriminatory Oklahoma Law Put on Hold: State Agrees Not to Distribute "Choose Life" License Plate Proceeds
11/4/04 - More Harm than Good: Florida’s Constitutional Amendment
11/3/04 - Bush Administration's War on Women: Responding to the Challenge of Four More Years
10/25/04 - Fourth Circuit to Review Injunction on Virginia’s So-called "Partial Birth Infanticide" Act
10/13/04 - Florida Court Strikes Down Law Forcing Abortion Providers To Give Patients Harmful Information
10/5/04 - Abortion Rights in Trouble New Study Shows
10/1/04 - New Abortion Study Finds: If Roe were Overturned Today, Over 70 Million Women in More than Half the Country Could Lose Access to Abortion
9/23/04 - Report Exposes Failure of Law to Address Reproductive Health Problems in India
9/17/04 - For the First Time, Indiana Court of Appeals Recognizes the Rights to Abortion is Protected Under State Constitution
9/8/04 - Federal Abortion Ban Struck Down in Nebraska Case
9/2/04 - Judge in Nebraska to Rule on Final Federal Abortion Ban Trial on Wednesday, September 8
8/3/04 - Court Shuts Down Man Who Fakes Abortion Services in Louisiana
8/3/04 - Nepalese Legal Experts Seek to Remedy Reproductive Health Violations
8/2/04 - Man Who Fakes Abortion Services to Appear in Hearing Wednesday
7/26/04 - Judge Blocks Enforcement of Kansas "Kiss and Tell" Law
7/23/04 - Court Enjoins New Abortion Law, Protecting Rights of Nearly 400 Mississippi Women
7/8/04 - Court Rejects Use of European Human Rights Law to Establish Fetal Rights
7/2/04 - Center Temporarily Blocks Mississippi Abortion Law
6/18/04 - Center Wins Appeal Against Arizona Abortion Regulation and Day in Court
6/10/04 - Court Orders Preliminary Injunction Against Utah Abortion Ban
6/10/04 - In Vitro Twins Ruled as Deceased Father’s Legitimate Children
6/7/04 - Louisiana Man Sued for Faking Abortion Services
6/2/04 - Closing Arguments Presented in Nebraska Federal Abortion Ban Trial
6/2/04 - Statement of Nancy Northup, President, Center for Reproductive Rights on S. 851 "The Child Custody Protection Act"
6/1/04 - Reproductive Rights Groups Hail First Ruling to Permanently Block Federal Abortion Ban
5/27/04 - Closing Arguments Begin in Carhart v. Ashcroft Federal Abortion Ban Trial in Nebraska
5/13/04 - South Asia Report Draws Attention to Reproductive Rights Violations
5/7/04 - Statement on the FDA's Refusal to Approve Emergency Contraception
5/6/04 - State of Utah Agrees to Order Temporarily Blocking Abortion Ban
4/9/04 - Notable Quotes from Nebraska Federal Abortion Ban Trial
3/31/04 - Update: Carhart v. Ashcroft Federal Abortion Ban Trial in Nebraska
3/29/-4 - Carhart V. Ashcroft Federal Abortion Trial Begins In Nebraska
3/26/04 - Federal Abortion Trial to Begin in Nebraska
3/22/04 - Carhart v. Ashcroft Federal Abortion Ban Trial to Begin in Nebraska
2/2/04 - Virginia’s Abortion Ban Struck Down by Federal Court
1/22/04 - January 22nd Marks 31 Years of Legal Abortion in the United States
1/14/04 - Lawsuit Filed Challenging Oklahoma's "Choose Life" License Plate Legislation
1/9/04 - Florida Court Refuses to Appoint Guardian for a Fetus
print this page | email this page | join mailing list
Abortion Rights in Trouble New Study Shows: If Roe v. Wade Were Overturned Today, Over 70 Million Women and Girls In More than Half the Country Would be Impacted

If the U.S. Supreme Court were to overturn Roe v. Wade today, millions of women in their childbearing years in more than half of the country could lose their right to choose abortion within a year’s time, some just in a matter of weeks. According to a new study published by the Center for Reproductive Rights, What If Roe Fell?, only 20 states would likely protect women against the enforcement of abortion bans. These states currently have legal protections in place, friendly legislatures or a combination of the two.

Meanwhile, women in 30 states remain vulnerable. Many have pre-Roe abortion bans on the books that can be revived. In others, their legislatures’ past activity or current composition has proven particularly hostile to abortion. And in some cases, more than one factor is at play.

What If Roe Fell? is the first detailed state-by-state legal analysis of what would happen after a Roe reversal. While the 1973 Supreme Court decision currently provides women with the constitutionally protected right to choose whether or not to terminate a pregnancy, the high Court is closely divided on the issue, as evidenced by recent rulings. Any changes in the Court’s makeup could shift the current balance. Should those changes occur and Roe is, in fact, overruled, abortion would likely become a state law issue.

The Center for Reproductive Rights conducted a state-by-state review of existing state laws, state constitutions and state legislatures. The study’s findings refute the false, but often voiced notion that relatively few states would outlaw abortion if Roe were overturned.

"Anyone who thinks abortion will still be legal in most states across this country after a Roe reversal hasn’t been paying attention," said Nancy Northup, President of the Center for Reproductive Rights. "This is a wake-up call to women and men who support the right to have an abortion – in a relatively short period of time, women in more than half the country are in jeopardy of losing their right to choose."

According to What If Roe Fell?, many states already have pre-Roe abortion bans on the books that could be enforced after a Roe reversal. For example, Michigan’s ban was blocked by the courts shortly after the Roe decision. But the day after Roe falls, Michigan officials could rush to court to lift the injunction, and in just a matter of days, begin enforcing the law. Doctors who performed abortions would be felons.

Alabama also has a pre-Roe abortion ban on the books, but unlike Michigan, it has never been enjoined by the courts. As a result, officials could begin enforcing the old law without going through the courts at all, immediately making abortion illegal in the state.

Also according to the report, the day after a Roe reversal, women seeking an abortion in states like Ohio may not have much time to obtain one. There’s no pre-Roe ban on the books in the state, but there aren’t any state constitutional or statutory protections of abortion rights either. The state has already passed numerous laws regulating abortion. And both the legislature and the governor are anti-choice. There’s likely to be a rush to bring legislation banning abortion to the governor’s desk and it will likely pass.

Here is the breakdown of the states and the level of risk for women to lose their abortion rights:

21 States at High Risk: Alabama, Arkansas, Colorado, Delaware, Kentucky, Louisiana, Michigan, Mississippi, Missouri, Nebraska, North Carolina, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, Rhode Island, South Carolina, South Dakota, Texas, Utah, Virginia, and Wisconsin.

9 states at Middle Risk: Arizona, Georgia, Idaho, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, New Hampshire, and Pennsylvania.

20 states Likely Protected: Alaska, California, Connecticut, Florida, Hawaii, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Minnesota, Montana, Nevada, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, Oregon, Tennessee, Vermont, Washington, West Virginia, and Wyoming.

Order or download the report What If Roe Fell?