12/29/2005 - Jan. 4th Teleconference for Reproductive Health Rights Groups
12/16/05 - FDA Court Date Rescheduled
12/13/05 - Center Study Exposes Government Neglect Of Women’s Health In East And Southeast Asia
12/8/05 -Launch of Women of the World East and Southeast Asia
11/29/05 - Statement on Ayotte v. Planned Parenthood of Northern New England
11/18/05 - Supreme Court Should Not Review Federal Abortion Ban Case, Center’s Brief Argues
11/17/05 - Victory for Reproductive Rights in Peru
11/14/05 - GAO's Report on FDA's Plan B Decision Process Confirms Center's Lawsuit
10/31/05 - Judge Alito’s Nomination is Deeply Troubling, Says Center for Reproductive Rights
10/12/05 - Center Files Friend-of-the-Court Brief
9/27/05 - Brief Against Supreme Court Review of Federal Abortion Ban Case
9/15/05 - Missouri Law Shuts Down Only Abortion Clinic in Southwest Missouri
9/15/05 - Federal Court Strikes Michigan Abortion Ban for Third Time
9/08/05 - Kansas
9/05/05 - Roberts' Nomination to Chief Justice
9/05/05 - Passing of Chief Justice Rehnquist
9/01/05 - 8 Questions Senators Must Ask Roberts
8/26/05 - Shame On the FDA: More Deception and Delay
8/9/05 - Leading Reproductive & Women’s Rights Organization Hold Press Conference
8/05/05 - Politics of Pataki Veto Highlight Need For FDA Action
7/19/05 - Center for Reproductive Rights Alarmed by Roberts Nomination
8/03/05 - When Voters Learn of Roberts’ Record, Support Plummets According to Focus Groups
7/14/05 - For First Time in NCLR’s History, Briefing on Reproductive Rights of Hispanic Women to be Held at Annual Conference
7/8/05 - Key Victory In Appeals Court Against 2003 Federal Abortion Ban
7/6/05 - To Protect Future Generations, Senate Must Require Full and Open Disclosure of Supreme Court Nominee’s Views, Constitutional Litigators Say
7/01/05 - Justice Sandra Day O’Connor Retires: Dramatic Change in Supreme Court Puts Reproductive Rights at Risk
6/23/05 - Law Endangering Young Women Challenged in Federal Court: Health Care Providers Say Law Imperils Health and Lives of Florida’s Young Women
6/23/05 - The Benefits of Roe v. Wade Are Clear: Center for Reproductive Rights’ Response to Senate Judiciary Subcommittee Hearing on Roe
6/20/05 - Civil Rights Chief from U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Eastern District of New York Joins Center
6/14/05 - Groups Ask Court to Block Abortion Ban: Leading Reproductive Health and Rights Groups Say Michigan Law Would Prohibit Virtually All Abortions in the State
6/2/05 - Court Stops Virginia’s Third Attempt to 6/2/05 - Outlaw Safe Abortions
6/1/05 - Court Strikes Down Mississippi Abortion Law: Women in State Narrowly Escape Virtual Ban on Second Trimester Abortion
5/19/05 - Tulsa Clinic Challenges Teen Abortion Act as it Hits Governor’s Desk
5/12/05 - The FDA Under Evangelical Influence on Plan B Decision? No Surprise There
4/27/05 - Teen Endangerment Act: Putting Politics Before Teens’ Well-Being
4/13/05 - FDA Commissioner Crawford, No More Stalling!
4/12/05 - U.S. Government’s Appeal in Federal Abortion Ban Case Heads to Court for the First Time
4/10/05 - Alaska Supreme Court to Review Injunction on State’s Teen Abortion Law
3/23/05 - Yet Another Excuse from the FDA on Delaying Plan B Decision
3/15/05 - Statement on the Teen Endangerment Act
3/14/05 - Michigan Abortion Ban Put on Hold While Challenge Proceeds
3/10/05 - Responding to India Supreme Court Decision on Country’s Sterilization Practices
3/4/05 - As World Eases Restrictions on Abortion, U.S. Becomes More Restrictive, Study Finds
3/2/05 - What’s Missing from the Beijing Platform?
3/1/05 - Women’s Health Care Providers Challenge Michigan Law Banning Virtually All Abortions
2/14/05 - Center for Reproductive Rights Appoints New Director of International Legal Program
1/21/05 - Center Sues FDA for denying Women Over-the-Counter Access to Emergency Contraception
1/21/05 - Statement from the Center for Reproductive Rights on the 32nd Anniversary of Roe v. Wade
1/05/05 - Alberto Gonzales: Three Questions the Attorney General Nominee Must Address
print this page | email this page | join mailing list
GAO Report on FDA’S Plan B Decision Process Confirms Center's Lawsuit


The Government Accountability Office released a report finding that the Food and Drug Administration’s refusal to make the emergency contraceptive, Plan B, available without a prescription was "unusual" and "not typical" of previous decisions on other over-the-counter drugs. On January 21, 2005, the Center for Reproductive Rights filed a lawsuit against the FDA in a New York federal court. The suit was filed on behalf of a national organization of reproductive health providers, several individual women activists, and a national organization dedicated to improving Latinas’ reproductive health. The lawsuit asks that the court order the FDA to make Plan B available without a prescription for women of all ages. Nancy Northup, President of the Center for Reproductive Rights, issued this statement in response to the GAO report.

"The GAO report confirms what our lawsuit has argued all along—the FDA broke its own rules, held Plan B to a higher standard than other over-the-counter drugs, and women have suffered the consequences. We call on the FDA to finally do the right thing and make Plan B available without a prescription to all women."

LAWSUIT AGAINST THE FDA OVER EMERGENCY CONTRACEPTION DECISION

On January 21, 2005, the Center for Reproductive Rights filed a lawsuit against the Food and Drug Administration’s Acting Commissioner for failing to make the emergency contraceptive product Plan B available without a prescription. The suit was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York on behalf of the Association of Reproductive Health Professionals (ARHP), National Latina Institute for Reproductive Health, and individuals from a grassroots advocacy group, the Morning-After Pill Conspiracy.

Key points of the lawsuit:

  • The plaintiffs are asking the court to order the FDA to make Plan B available without a prescription for women of all ages. Increased access to emergency contraception (EC) promotes public health by improving opportunities for women and adolescents to use the drug when they face a crisis. Plan B is only effective for a short time after unprotected sex, and it works most effectively if used within 24 hours of intercourse. Widespread use could prevent as many as half of the 3 million unintended pregnancies in the U.S. each year.
  • The FDA is ignoring sound medicine. Decades of scientific research and real-life experience among women of all ages around the world show that Plan B is effective and safe for self-medication. The FDA’s own expert panels have recommended that the pill be switched to over-the-counter status. An internal FDA memo also acknowledges that the clinical data before the agency "clearly support"making Plan B available without a prescription "for all age groups," and that such approval would be "consistent" with previous decisions on other products.
  • The FDA is holding Plan B to a different and higher standard than other over-the-counter drugs. As an internal agency memorandum indicates, the FDA has not previously "distinguished the safety and efficacy of Plan B and other forms of hormonal contraception among different ages of women," and there is no "compelling scientific reason" for such a distinction in this case.
  • By ignoring scientific fact and holding Plan B to a different standard, the FDA is failing to follow its own procedures and statutory and regulatory mandates. According to the FDA’s own regulations, a drug should be approved for over-the-counter use when it is proven to be effective and safe for self-medication. The FDA’s application of a different standard to granting Plan B over-the-counter status was the result of factors that fall outside of the agency’s statutory mandate.