Thanks for signing up to receive the latest information from the Center for Reproductive Rights!
As a valued partner in the Center’s work, here are a few other things you can do to stay connected:
- or -
06.28.13 - (PRESS RELEASE) A Kansas district court judge has issued a temporary injunction blocking two of the most egregious provisions of a new Kansas law encompassing nearly 50 pages of unconstitutional and discriminatory restrictions on the provision of abortion care and the rights of women and their reproductive health care providers.
The provisions enjoined by the judge’s order include one that callously redefines what constitutes a medical emergency in a way that would require many pregnant women in life-threatening situations to wait at least 24 hours before obtaining emergency abortion care—including women who are hemorrhaging, suffering from a serious infection, or facing an ectopic pregnancy about to rupture—and another that requires doctors to endorse anti-abortion propaganda forced on their patients by the state as "objective, nonjudgmental, and scientifically accurate.
"But doctors will still have to provide medically inaccurate information to their patients seeking an abortion when the law goes into effect on July 1. Other provisions not enjoined by today’s order impose discriminatory tax penalties on abortion patients, abortion providers, and others who facilitate access to abortion services, and even prohibit abortion providers from chaperoning their schoolchildren's field trips or otherwise acting as school district representatives.
Said Julie Rikelman, litigation director for the Center for Reproductive Rights:
“Today's ruling is an important victory, protecting the women of Kansas from the most dangerous and misleading provisions of the Kansas legislature's latest attack on their health and rights.
“However, it leaves in place other provisions that unconstitutionally discriminate against women and their doctors and seek to prevent them from exercising their fundamental right to make their own decisions about their health, families, and future free of the interference of hostile politicians pushing an ideological agenda.
"We will continue our campaign to ensure that all parts of the law are permanently overturned."
The Center filed the lawsuit, Hodes & Nauser MDs, P.A. v. Schmidt, in state court on June 21, 2013, on behalf of Dr. Herbert Hodes and Dr. Traci Nauser, a father-daughter medical team that provides a full range of ob-gyn services in Overland Park, Kan.
Among other restrictions enacted as part of HB 2253, which was signed into law by Kansas Governor Sam Brownback on April 19, the law:
Drs. Hodes and Nauser are both board certified ob-gyns that have been providing a full range of reproductive health care—including annual exams, childbirth, contraception, fertility treatments, and abortion services—to their patients for more than 40 years collectively.
The Center is also currently litigating a 2011 Kansas' law on behalf of Drs. Hodes and Nauser that would impose unreasonable and unnecessary licensing regulations aimed at shuttering most, if not all, Kansas abortion providers. That law has been blocked by a state judge since the lawsuit was filed in November 2011.
Stephanie Toti, senior staff attorney for the Center for Reproductive Rights, is lead counsel on the case. Also representing the plaintiffs are local counsel Teresa Woody, The Woody Law Firm PC; Kent Yalowitz, Laura W. Tejeda and Meredith Esser of Arnold & Porter LLP and Rene M. Netherton in Topeka, KS.