Annual Reports
30 Faces of Roe
Abortion in Nepal: Women Imprisoned
An Unfulfilled Human Right: Family Planning in Guatemala
Beyond the Law: Justice and Gender in Latin America
Bodies on Trial: Reproductive Rights in Latin American Courts
Body and Soul: Forced Sterilization and Other Assaults on Roma Reproductive Freedom in Slovakia
Breaking the Silence: The Global Gag Rule's Impact on Unsafe Abortion
Breaking Through: A Guide to Sexual and Reproductive Health and Rights
Bringing Rights to Bear: An Analysis of the Work of the UN Treaty Monitoring Bodies on Reproductive and Sexual Rights
Claiming Our Rights: Surviving Pregnancy and Childbirth in Mali
Failure to Deliver: Violations of Human Rights in Kenyan Health Facilities
Female Genital Mutilation: A Guide to Laws and Policies Worldwide
Female Genital Mutilation:A Matter of Human Rights, An Advocate's Guide to Action
Gaining Ground:A Tool for Advancing Reproductive Rights Law Reform
Imposing Misery
Legal Grounds: Reproductive and Sexual Rights in African Commonwealth Courts
Litigating Reproductive Rights: Using Public Interest Litigation and International Law to Promote Gender Justice in India
Paulina: Five Years Later
Persecuted: Political Process and Abortion Legislation in El Salvador
Removing Barriers Improving Choices: Health Svcs Managed Care
Reproductive Rights 2000: Moving Forward
Reproductive Rights are Human Rights
Roe v. Wade and the Right to Privacy
Silence and Complicity: Violence Against Women in Peruvian Public Health Facilities
State of Denial: Adolescent Reproductive Rights in Zimbabwe
Tipping the Scales
Women Behind Bars: Chile's Abortion Laws
Women of the World: Anglophone Africa
Women of the World: East and Southeast Asia
What If Roe Fell? The State-by-State Consequences of Overturning Roe v. Wade
What If Roe Fell? The State-by-State Consequences of Overturning Roe v. Wade (2nd edition)
Women of the World: East Central Europe
Women of the World: Francophone Africa
Women of the World: Formal Laws and Policies Affecting Their Reproductive Lives
Women of the World: Latin America and the Caribbean
Women of the World: South Asia
print this page | email this page | join mailing list

What If Roe Fell? 2007

The Laws in Your State, the Day After. . .

Roe v. Wade, the Supreme Court decision recognizing a woman's right to abortion, remains under constant attack. Since the Center for Reproductive Rights first released its What If Roe Fell? report in 2004, the Supreme Court has become decidedly more conservative and less sympathetic to Roe, a fact that has emboldened anti-choice forces. The Center's report, "What if Roe Fell?", exposes anti-choice activists' latest strategies to criminalize abortion at every stage of a woman's pregnancy.

  • To read the full report, click here >>

    In 2004, the Center found that 30 states were poised to criminalize abortion soon after a Roe reversal. Many have pre-Roe abortion bans on the books that could be revived, some in just a matter of weeks. Over the past three years, a new strategy has emerged: bans-in-waiting, spring-loaded to criminalize abortion the instant Roe is overturned, and immediate bans that criminalize abortion as soon as they're signed into law. Immediate bans are intended to force the Supreme Court to reexamine Roe, a troubling prospect given the Court's decision just this year in Gonzales v. Carhart. Since 2004, an unprecedented number of both types of bans have been introduced -- 38 bans have been introduced in 17 states. Four bans-in-waiting have passed: in Louisiana, Mississippi, North Dakota, and South Dakota.

  • The New Legal Landscape: A Three--Pronged Attack on Abortion Rights >>

    Poll: Majority of Americans Favor Federal Law to Protect Abortion Rights

    In research conducted for the Center by Lake Research Associates, Americans say they want abortion to remain a federally protected right. Their support for Roe is clear. And they recognize that Roe is threatened.

    What they don't seem to know is what would happen if the decision were overturned, how vulnerable many of them would be to losing their right to legal abortion, depending on what state they live in.

    The poll found that:

    • Americans believe that Roe v. Wade is vulnerable under the current Supreme Court, but at the same time are largely unaware of legislative efforts underway at the state level to further undermine Roe.
    • The majority of Americans doesn't know what abortion laws exist in their state and tend to believe their state is supportive of abortion rights.
    • Seven in 10 Americans agree that government should not interfere with medically necessary procedures prescribed by health care professionals, including abortions.
    • The majority of voters favors their state making changes in the law to further protect a woman's right to abortion.
  • Click here to learn more about the poll results >>
  • Click here to view the Lake Research Associates presentation >>

    More Resources